| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 09/28/15 04:31:08 | Possibly detected | 43.9587 | -62.7349 | Right: really nice classified upcall in p4. Loud, isolated, shapely as well. But it's the only one
so I have to stick with possible. |
| 09/28/15 07:46:08 | Possibly detected | 43.9791 | -62.7390 | Right: Nice, classified, isolated, loud, shapely upcall. Another unshapely candidate classified
as humpback, and a third unclassified, unshapely amid other noise. Not confident enough for
detected, but good enough for possible |
| 09/28/15 08:16:08 | Detected | 43.9792 | -62.7451 | Right: 3 shapely, loud, isolated upcalls. 2 are classified right and the 3rd is classified
humpback. Confident enough for detected. |
| 09/28/15 08:46:08 | Detected | 43.9795 | -62.7496 | Right: many upcalls, great example |
| 09/28/15 09:46:08 | Detected | 43.9798 | -62.7607 | Right: more great upcall examples |
| 09/28/15 10:01:08 | Possibly detected | 43.9799 | -62.7642 | Right: 2 isolated, classified, loud upcalls in p7. First example is quite shapely, second is quite
steep. No other candidate calls. Borderline so going with possible to be conservative. |
| 09/28/15 10:46:08 | Possibly detected | 43.9802 | -62.7721 | Right: single classified, loud, shapely, isolated upcall. No other convincing candidates,
enough for possible.
Fin: series of 4 faint classified calls but no pattern evident. Not enough for possible. |
| 09/28/15 11:46:08 | Detected | 43.9806 | -62.7834 | Right: more great upcalls |
| 09/28/15 13:46:08 | Detected | 43.9919 | -62.7895 | Right: 5 possible upcalls. 1 in p4 is unconvincing because of ugly shape and other noise. 2 is
shapely and isolated, but classified as humpback with strange amplitude distribution. 3 (in
p10) is shapely, isolated, and classified but very faint. Probably the best one. 4 is classified
and loud but with very ugly shape. 5 is unclassified but nice otherwise. Even if the first is
disregarded this meets the protocol for detected, and I'm confident enough to agree.
Also a very interesting looking downsweep in p12 (moan?). Check spectrogram. |
| 09/28/15 16:46:08 | Detected | 43.9844 | -62.8202 | Right: more nice upcalls, several are classified as humpback call type 18. |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 09/28/15 04:31:08 | 43.9587 | -62.7349 | Right: really nice classified upcall in p4. Loud, isolated, shapely as well. But it's the only one
so I have to stick with possible. |
| 09/28/15 05:01:08 | 43.9601 | -62.7408 | Right: nice, unclassified upcall in p14 that's loud, shapely and isolated. Not enough for
possible without classification. |
| 09/28/15 07:46:08 | 43.9791 | -62.7390 | Right: Nice, classified, isolated, loud, shapely upcall. Another unshapely candidate classified
as humpback, and a third unclassified, unshapely amid other noise. Not confident enough for
detected, but good enough for possible |
| 09/28/15 08:16:08 | 43.9792 | -62.7451 | Right: 3 shapely, loud, isolated upcalls. 2 are classified right and the 3rd is classified
humpback. Confident enough for detected. |
| 09/28/15 08:46:08 | 43.9795 | -62.7496 | Right: many upcalls, great example |
| 09/28/15 09:01:08 | 43.9796 | -62.7529 | Right: several possible calls, but the only classified one is not convincing - it's amid noise
with a very ugly shape. Two other possibilities are fragmented (cut in half, maybe due to
algorithm's removal of narrow band noise). Tempting (especially due to previous records) but
not enough evidence here for possible. |
| 09/28/15 09:46:08 | 43.9798 | -62.7607 | Right: more great upcall examples |
| 09/28/15 10:01:08 | 43.9799 | -62.7642 | Right: 2 isolated, classified, loud upcalls in p7. First example is quite shapely, second is quite
steep. No other candidate calls. Borderline so going with possible to be conservative. |
| 09/28/15 10:46:08 | 43.9802 | -62.7721 | Right: single classified, loud, shapely, isolated upcall. No other convincing candidates,
enough for possible.
Fin: series of 4 faint classified calls but no pattern evident. Not enough for possible. |
| 09/28/15 11:01:08 | 43.9802 | -62.7746 | Loud unknown swoops in 400-600 Hz range. Check spectrogram. |
| 09/28/15 11:46:08 | 43.9806 | -62.7834 | Right: more great upcalls |
| 09/28/15 12:01:08 | 43.9807 | -62.7856 | Fin: extremely loud pattern with consistent IPI that persists throughout the pitch track but
only 2 are classified fin (and that call may have only been classified because the pitch track
was broken). Not aware of noise processes that do this. Looks like classic fin but why aren't
more classified? Going with possible. Check spectrogram. |
| 09/28/15 13:46:08 | 43.9919 | -62.7895 | Right: 5 possible upcalls. 1 in p4 is unconvincing because of ugly shape and other noise. 2 is
shapely and isolated, but classified as humpback with strange amplitude distribution. 3 (in
p10) is shapely, isolated, and classified but very faint. Probably the best one. 4 is classified
and loud but with very ugly shape. 5 is unclassified but nice otherwise. Even if the first is
disregarded this meets the protocol for detected, and I'm confident enough to agree.
Also a very interesting looking downsweep in p12 (moan?). Check spectrogram. |
| 09/28/15 14:01:08 | 43.9914 | -62.7917 | Fin: same problem as before, with very loud, consistent, fin-looking pattern of LF pulses but
only 1 is classified. There is a subsequent faint pattern that emerges in p5-6 with 2 classified
calls. Only enough for possible according to protocol, and I'll stick with that to stay
conservative. Check spectrogram. |
| 09/28/15 14:46:08 | 43.9895 | -62.7995 | Fin: 3 classified calls in pattern with consistent IPIs. There's 1 call missing from the pattern
that would connect a group of 2 and 3 pulses, but I'm going with possible according to
protocol. |
| 09/28/15 15:46:08 | 43.9869 | -62.8101 | Fin: again there's evidence of some long LF pulses that are patterned not classified. Not
enough for possible. Check spectrogram. |
| 09/28/15 16:46:08 | 43.9844 | -62.8202 | Right: more nice upcalls, several are classified as humpback call type 18. |