| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 08/29/15 13:02:57 | Possibly detected | 42.9287 | -65.1026 | beautiful classified downsweep in panel 11. No sign of humpbacks. Possible sei? |
| 08/29/15 14:02:57 | Possibly detected | 42.9318 | -65.1120 | nice classified downsweep in panel 10. classified Eg upcall not seen in record. |
| 08/29/15 17:32:57 | Possibly detected | 42.9282 | -65.0785 | Several loud singlet downsweeps in this record. One is classified as call type 17. However, the call classified as sei (call type 1) is not entirely convincing; it is faint and oddly shaped, although it is classified and isolated. Given that the really good calls in this record are not classified as sei, Im not inclined to go detected for sei. |
| 08/29/15 18:17:57 | Detected | 42.9308 | -65.0872 | 3 nice downsweeps classified as call type 17. |
| 08/29/15 18:32:57 | Possibly detected | 42.9315 | -65.0897 | FW: sequence of calls in panels 12-13
SW: downsweeps in pnaels 2, 9 and 16. Last is classified as call type 17.
|
| 08/29/15 20:02:57 | Possibly detected | 42.9272 | -65.1090 | downsweeps in panels 10 and 12, latter classified as call type 17. |
| 08/29/15 20:17:57 | Possibly detected | 42.9283 | -65.1124 | Call type 17 classified downsweep in panel 11 |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 08/29/15 00:32:57 | 42.9094 | -65.0706 | The downsweep in panel 9 is loud and isolated and classified as call type 17, but shape is not great, is almost s-shaped rather than a downsweep. Not convinced. Check spectrogram. |
| 08/29/15 02:12:25 | 42.8908 | -65.0191 | classified upcall not seen in record. |
| 08/29/15 04:46:57 | 42.8923 | -65.0354 | sequence of 4 FW calls in panel 6 |
| 08/29/15 05:17:57 | 42.8852 | -65.0169 | No sequences in this one, and a lot of other LF tones besides classified FW calls. |
| 08/29/15 05:32:57 | 42.8854 | -65.0190 | sequence of 3 FW calls in panel 7. Several short downsweeps and some other faint tonals as well. |
| 08/29/15 06:02:57 | 42.8860 | -65.0240 | Classified upcall is faint and short, not convincing. |
| 08/29/15 06:17:57 | 42.8862 | -65.0257 | several downsweeps |
| 08/29/15 07:02:57 | 42.8875 | -65.0333 | several downsweeps |
| 08/29/15 07:32:57 | 42.9001 | -65.0496 | moan? |
| 08/29/15 08:02:57 | 42.8983 | -65.0534 | What are long tonals in pansl 9-10 and 12? check spectrogram |
| 08/29/15 08:17:57 | 42.8977 | -65.0545 | another long, faint tonal in panel 2 |
| 08/29/15 09:02:57 | 42.8991 | -65.0619 | 3 FW calls in panel 3. |
| 08/29/15 09:17:57 | 42.8995 | -65.0640 | sequence of 3 FW calls in panel 5-6. |
| 08/29/15 12:02:57 | 42.9255 | -65.0922 | The variety of tonals in panel 8 are convincing for humpbacks.
There is a loud classified right whale upcall in panel 9, the shape on it is not great because the frequency and amplitude suddenly decrease at the end of the call, and its within a bout of humpback calling, and there is a sequence of upcall-like sounds in the subsequent panel that are more likely humpback. Its not convincing enough for a possible. |
| 08/29/15 13:02:57 | 42.9287 | -65.1026 | beautiful classified downsweep in panel 11. No sign of humpbacks. Possible sei? |
| 08/29/15 14:02:57 | 42.9318 | -65.1120 | nice classified downsweep in panel 10. classified Eg upcall not seen in record. |
| 08/29/15 15:02:57 | 42.9207 | -65.0531 | classified upcall not convincing - short, poor shape, faint. |
| 08/29/15 15:17:57 | 42.9215 | -65.0558 | sequence of 3 FW calls in panel 16 |
| 08/29/15 16:17:57 | 42.9245 | -65.0662 | What are tonals in panel 12? |
| 08/29/15 16:32:57 | 42.9253 | -65.0687 | Classified downsweep (call type 17) in panel 3 is quite flat in shape. |
| 08/29/15 16:47:57 | 42.9261 | -65.0714 | unclassified downsweep in panel 8 |
| 08/29/15 17:17:57 | 42.9277 | -65.0767 | classified (call type 17) downsweep in panel 15 is quite short and not shapely. Not convincing for sei. 400-600 Hz downsweep in panel 16 |
| 08/29/15 17:32:57 | 42.9282 | -65.0785 | Several loud singlet downsweeps in this record. One is classified as call type 17. However, the call classified as sei (call type 1) is not entirely convincing; it is faint and oddly shaped, although it is classified and isolated. Given that the really good calls in this record are not classified as sei, Im not inclined to go detected for sei. |
| 08/29/15 18:02:57 | 42.9299 | -65.0842 | unclassified downsweep in panel 15 |
| 08/29/15 18:17:57 | 42.9308 | -65.0872 | 3 nice downsweeps classified as call type 17. |
| 08/29/15 18:32:57 | 42.9315 | -65.0897 | FW: sequence of calls in panels 12-13
SW: downsweeps in pnaels 2, 9 and 16. Last is classified as call type 17.
|
| 08/29/15 20:02:57 | 42.9272 | -65.1090 | downsweeps in panels 10 and 12, latter classified as call type 17. |
| 08/29/15 20:17:57 | 42.9283 | -65.1124 | Call type 17 classified downsweep in panel 11 |